Built for developers · Your site data is never shared, sold or used for benchmarks · privacy policy

8-axes site screening for wind or solar in 30 seconds.

Resource · Grid · Land · Environmental · Market · Sponsor · Social · Logistics

If the site passes, run a full pre-feasibility study: AEP, LCOE, IRR. Same session, same wallet. End to end in 30 minutes. Screen multiple sites — commit to one.

One platform. No spreadsheets. No consultants for the first cut.

20 free credits on signup — run a Site Screener OR a full Wind/Solar/Hybrid study. No card. Magic-link signup, any email.
Or try a mini tool below — no signup needed Try it
01 Site Screener
8-axis verdict · 20 cr live
02 Wind preFeasibility
full study · 16 cr live
03 Solar preFeasibility
full study · 16 cr live
04 Hybrid sizing
full study · 16 cr live
05 PPA structuring
5 credits soon
site-preview · live
4-axis quick check (free)
Preview — 4-axis quick check (free, no login)
Drop a pin on the map or enter coords, pick tech, then Check site.
Impression
Site Preview checks Environmental, Pipeline, Risk and Sponsor axes — free, no login. Full 8-axis screen includes Resource, Grid, Land & Logistics with PDF report.

Early-stage feasibility runs in Excel — fast, cheap, and good enough for a first look.
But turning those models into traceable, benchmark-backed outputs that hold up to a lender, a partner, or your own internal review? That's where Excel breaks.

preFeasibility closes the gap — one structured, data-backed platform that produces a study you can actually defend.

Version chaos
model_v7_FINAL_2.xlsx
Stale assumptions
CAPEX from a 2021 deck
?
Undocumented changes
who changed this formula?
No benchmark context
is $54/MWh good or not?
Single source of truth
traceable · benchmarked · firm
The platform
Six tools. One pre-feasibility stack.
Pick your entry point. Click any card to see exactly how it works.
Same wallet · Credits never expire · PDF export included with every run
How it works
Two workflows. One platform.
Start with a 30-second screen. If the site passes, upgrade to a full study — same data spine, same wallet, same PDF export. End to end in under 30 minutes.
SITE SCREENER
30 seconds. 8 axes. KILL, CAUTION or PASS per axis.
20 credits · Class 4
1
Drop a pin
Pick your site on the map or enter coordinates
2
Choose tech
Wind, solar or hybrid
3
8-axis engine
Resource · Grid · Land · Env · Market · Sponsor · Social · Logistics
4
Verdict
KILL · CAUTION · PASS per axis
5
PDF report
KILL · CAUTION · PASS summary · All sources cited
SAMPLE OUTPUT — 50 MW Wind, Spain
Resource Grid Land Environmental Market Sponsor Social Logistics
RESOURCE
✓ PASS
7.2 m/s at 100m
GRID
✓ PASS
Substation 12 km
LAND
✓ PASS
No constraints
ENVIRONMENT
⚠ CAUTION
Natura 2000 within 10 km
MARKET
✓ PASS
Stable regime
SPONSOR
✓ PASS
Low country risk
SOCIAL
✓ PASS
Low INFORM score
LOGISTICS
✓ PASS
Road access 2 km
Site passes the screen?
↓ Upgrade to a full study — same platform, same wallet
FULL STUDY
Six steps. Detailed financials. Decision-grade output.
16 credits · Wind / Solar / Hybrid
1
SITE
Pick & validate
Drop a pin. Configure parameters. Validated against regional norms before you commit a single assumption.
2
RESOURCE
Assess resource
Weibull distributions from DTU Global Wind Atlas. Irradiance from PVGIS-SARAH3. Calibrated to your coordinates.
3
ENERGY
Energy yield (P50/P75/P90)
25-year horizon. Wake losses, degradation, configurable loss stack. Firm estimate feeds financials.
4
FINANCIAL
LCOE · IRR · NPV
Benchmarked against country distribution across 6 dimensions. Three scenarios — conservative, base, optimistic — run simultaneously.
5
SITE ACCESS
Infrastructure proximity
Grid & road distances from OpenStreetMap. Staged radii. No manual GIS work required.
6
ENVIRONMENT
Environmental screening
Protected areas, habitats, constraints at multiple radii — Natura 2000, WDPA, KBA. Full PDF export.
Site Screener 20 cr · 30 sec · KILL / CAUTION / PASS
Full Study 16 cr · Wind / Solar / Hybrid · ~30 min full study
Why us
Built by active developers, for active developers.
We built preFeasibility because we were tired of 2 a.m. version-control nightmares, hunting CAPEX from old pitch decks, and presenting LCOE numbers without knowing where they sat against the country median. We could not find a screening tool that stood up to internal review — so we built one. No black boxes. Just traceable, benchmarked, decision-grade outputs.
Full methodology published → Why we built this → Model changelog versioned · No silent revisions
Benchmark intelligence
Available in the full prefeasibility study (Wind / Solar / Hybrid).

Context that turns a number into a decision

Every result is benchmarked across six dimensions against the country median — LCOE, CAPEX, capacity factor, OPEX, WACC and project lifetime. You see not just where your cost lands, but which assumptions are driving the gap. Built from IRENA, Lazard and BNEF data, updated annually.

Knowing your LCOE is $52/MWh is useful. Knowing it is 15% below the Spanish median because your capacity factor is at the regional ceiling — that's what a serious analyst needs before a client meeting.

6-metric comparison · project vs Spain median · 2024
LCOE
$52 /MWh
vs median $61 ↓15%
CAPEX
$1,280 /kW
vs median $1,350 ↓5%
Capacity factor
38%
vs median 32% ↑ verify
OPEX
$32 /kW/yr
vs median $34 in range
WACC
8.0%
vs median 8.5% in range
Project life
25 years
vs median 25 standard
Capacity factor is at the upper end of the regional range. Verify against a resource assessment before presenting to investors.
Source: IRENA Renewable Power 2024 · Lazard LCOE+ 2024 · BNEF 2024 · benchmarks in USD per industry convention
Full output suite
Available in the full prefeasibility study (Wind / Solar / Hybrid).

Every metric a developer or investor needs — in one run

LCOE, AEP with 25-year degradation, Project IRR, NPV, breakeven PPA and CO₂ avoided. Three parallel scenarios — conservative, base, optimistic — computed simultaneously.

Project IRR only — equity IRR requires debt sizing, DSRA and tax-equity structures, which are out of scope at the screening stage.

Conservative
$51.2
IRR 7.1%
Base
$42.1
IRR 9.5%
Optimistic
$36.8
IRR 12.4%
AEP yr 1
306 GWh
Breakeven PPA
$42 /MWh
NPV
$18 M
CO₂ avoided
142 kt/yr
Run comparison
Available in the full prefeasibility study (Wind / Solar / Hybrid).

Compare projects and scenarios side by side

Every saved run is a permanent record — inputs, outputs and benchmark position. Select two or more runs and compare them in a structured table: LCOE, IRR, NPV, CAPEX, capacity factor and country percentile, side by side. Track how a project evolves across assumption revisions, or evaluate one site against another in a different market.

Designed for the professional managing multiple projects or iterating through scenarios. Available at the €50 wallet threshold.

Cross-run comparison · 3 saved runs selected
Run A
Poland · 120 MW
Run B · best
Spain · 100 MW
Run C
Germany · 80 MW
LCOE
$48.2 /MWh
$42.1 /MWh
$55.6 /MWh
IRR
10.4%
12.1%
8.3%
Percentile
41st
28th
62nd
Cap. factor
34%
38%
29%
Run B highlighted as best-performing across LCOE, IRR and country percentile.
Input validation
Available in the full prefeasibility study (Wind / Solar / Hybrid).

Catch unrealistic assumptions before they reach your output

As inputs are entered, we compare them against country norms in real time. If CAPEX is unusually low for the region, or capacity factor sits outside the observed range, a flag appears inline — before the model runs. You decide whether to proceed, with full visibility of the risk.

One of the most common sources of credibility loss in early-stage analysis is an assumption that looked reasonable in isolation but was inconsistent with the market.

Input validation · Poland · onshore wind
CAPEX
Within range
$1,100 /kW
Capacity factor
Above regional range
42% (P50)
Polish onshore P50 typically sits at 30–36%. A 42% reading is achievable at premium sites but warrants verification against a wind resource study.
WACC
Within range
7.5%
In the lab
Being synthesised.
We start with onshore wind and utility-scale solar. Every tool and technology in the roadmap is already taking shape.
Tools roadmap
Site Screener
8-axis KILL · CAUTION · PASS verdict. Resource, grid, land, environmental, market, sponsor, social, logistics.
Live now
LCOE calculator
Full engine with benchmarks, scenarios, sensitivity and input validation.
Live now
AEP estimator
Map-based capacity factor estimation with data from DTU and NASA POWER.
Live now
Hybrid sizing
Optimal wind/solar mix for minimum blended LCOE or maximum IRR.
Live now
PPA structuring
Fixed, merchant, blended and green-premium structures with EMBER references.
In synthesis
Technology roadmap
Onshore wind
Full engine live. Country benchmarks across top 10 markets, expanding to 50.
Live now
Solar PV
Utility-scale and C&I. PVGIS-SARAH3 irradiance. Site-specific energy yield and financial analysis.
Live now
Green hydrogen
Levelised cost of hydrogen in $/kg. Electrolyser sizing and utilisation modelling.
In synthesis
Green ammonia
Haber-Bosch pathway cost model in $/tonne. Pending demand-signal validation.
In synthesis
Pricing
Pay per run. No subscription. Credits never expire.
€5 per credit. A Site Screener is 20 credits (€100), a full Wind/Solar study is 16 credits (€80), Hybrid is 16 credits (€80). Your first screen is on us. PDF export is included with every paid run.
What's included with every credit — PDF export with full input log, saved-run history, and benchmark comparison panel. The €50+ wallet tier unlocks cross-run comparison; the €100+ tier unlocks Excel export.
€50+ → cross-run comparison
€100+ → Excel export
Free
First study free
€0
20 credits on signup — run a Site Screener OR a full Wind/Solar/Hybrid study. Magic-link signup, any email domain, no card required.
20 credits (€100 value) — one Site Screener or full study
PDF export of your study included
Any email domain — magic link, no password
No cross-run comparison (top up €50+ to unlock)
Pay as you go
Credit wallet
€5 per credit
Top up any amount. Credits never expire. Volume packs give you more runs for less. The more you commit, the lower your per-run cost.
5 credits — €25 (€5.00 / credit)
12 credits — €50 save 17%
28 credits — €100 save 30%
PDF export & saved-run history included
€50+ wallet → cross-run comparison
€100+ wallet → Excel export
Credits never expire
Tool
Stage
Credits
Status
Site Screener
Class 4
20 · €100
Live
Full Wind study
Class 4
16 · €80
Live
Full Solar study
Class 4
16 · €80
Live
Full Hybrid study
Class 3–4
16 · €80
Live
PPA / offtake structuring
Class 4
5 · €25
In the lab
Full study = 16 credits = €80 standard · €57.14 with the 28-credit pack (€3.57/credit). Site Screener = 20 credits = €100.
Benchmark data (LCOE, CAPEX, OPEX) shown in USD per IRENA / Lazard / BNEF industry convention. All platform pricing in EUR.
FAQ
Questions worth asking
Common questions, straight answers.
What does the free tier include?
20 free credits on signup — run your first Site Screen free, or use the credits toward a full Wind, Solar or Hybrid study. PDF export is included. Email magic link, any domain, no card required. Top up for additional screens or full studies.
How does the credit model work?
Each tool run consumes a fixed number of credits — Site Screener is 20 credits, full Wind/Solar study is 16 credits, Hybrid is 16 credits. Credits cost €5 each, never expire, and there are no subscriptions or monthly minimums. A wallet of €50+ unlocks cross-run comparison; €100+ unlocks Excel export.
How reliable are the outputs?
Output quality is a direct function of input quality. The platform is designed for the rigorous first pass — to decide whether a site is worth €50k+ on a professional feasibility study. Regional defaults give a credible indicative range; project-specific inputs yield a firm, traceable result. These are screening outputs, not investment-grade financial models — built on IRENA, Lazard and BNEF benchmark data, with every assumption explicit.
What currency do you use?
Pricing is in EUR. LCOE, CAPEX and OPEX benchmarks remain in USD per IRENA, Lazard and BNEF industry convention — but all platform pricing and invoicing is in EUR.
What is the difference between Project IRR and equity IRR?
Project IRR measures the return on total project capital before debt service — a standard metric for technology and cost comparison. Equity IRR requires debt sizing, sculpted repayment schedules, reserve accounts and tax treatment. We compute Project IRR and are explicit about this on every output.
Where does the benchmark data come from?
Country benchmarks are derived from IRENA Renewable Power Generation Costs, Lazard LCOE+ and BNEF — updated annually. Wind resource is from DTU Global Wind Atlas; solar irradiance from PVGIS-SARAH3. Each data point is cited with source, publication year and methodology reference. Updates are versioned in the public model changelog — there are no silent revisions.
Can outputs be included in client deliverables?
Yes. PDF export is included with every paid run (and the free study) and carries a permanent disclaimer plus full input log so recipients can verify every assumption. Excel export is available for users with €100+ in their wallet.
Is my project data private?
Yes. Your projects are stored in a Supabase database with Row Level Security — meaning only you can access your own data. Not even our team can view your site inputs or results. We don't aggregate your projects into benchmarks, we don't sell your data, and we don't share it with anyone. We're a small team and we built this because we think developers deserve a straightforward tool that respects their work. See our privacy policy for full details.
What does a full prefeasibility study include?
Six structured steps: site selection, resource assessment, power & energy (AEP — P50/P75/P90), financial analysis (LCOE, IRR, NPV), a site access study (grid and road proximity from OpenStreetMap), and an environmental screening report (protected areas and habitat constraints at staged radii). Each step feeds the next; the complete study is exportable as a PDF.
What's the difference between the Site Screener and a full Prefeasibility Study?
The Site Screener gives you a 30-second 8-axis verdict — resource, grid, land, environmental, market, sponsor, social, logistics. It returns KILL, CAUTION or PASS for each axis. A full prefeasibility study is a deeper six-step analysis with detailed financial modelling (LCOE, IRR, NPV), P50/P75/P90 energy yield, and structured PDF export. Start with the screener; if the site passes, upgrade to a full study from the same wallet.
Do you provide consultancy?
No. preFeasibility operates at the pre-consultancy stage. It is designed for developers and analysts who need structured, data-backed screening and indicative modelling before committing to professional feasibility consultants. The outputs are decision-grade for screening — not a substitute for investment-grade engineering or financial advisory.
Is this AI powered?
No — and that's intentional. Every output is derived from established engineering and finance formulas applied to real-world data: NASA MERRA-2 wind climatology, PVGIS-SARAH3 satellite irradiance, ENTSO-E capture rates, and IRENA / Lazard / BNEF benchmark datasets.

Wind yield follows Weibull-based AEP modelling. Financial metrics — LCOE, IRR, NPV — use standard discounted cash flow methodology. Site screening scores each axis against published thresholds and country-cohort benchmarks. Every input is explicit. Every formula is auditable.

We don't use AI because pre-feasibility outputs need to be defensible. When a site reaches your desk — or a lender's — "the model said so" is not an answer. A deterministic formula with known inputs and traceable logic is.
Do unused credits expire?
No. Credits never expire. Top up once and use them across multiple projects and tools over any timeframe. There are no monthly minimums, no subscription commitments and no penalties for inactivity.
What happens if the site fails the screen?
A KILL verdict on any axis is a signal, not a final ruling. It means the data available at screening resolution — resource climatology, grid proximity, protected area boundaries — points to a structural concern worth investigating before spending further. Some KILLs turn into viable projects with better site-specific data. Others confirm what the screen suggested. Either way, you've spent 30 seconds and 20 credits rather than weeks and €50k finding out.

preFeasibility,  done right.

Screen your site in 30 seconds. Full study ready in under 30 minutes.

View a sample report
No credit card · No subscription · First site screen free · Site Screener 20 credits · Full study 16 credits